Bad science alert: Your planet’s plants, good and bad

  • Comments 3

Wikimedia Commons
All right, yesterday I ranted at ya a bit over the nonsense energy drink phenomenon that is making lots of marketing groups and beverage companies super rich as you swill their heavily caffeinated water. Today I’m gonna report on an equally bogus misrepresentation that has been going on for many years, completely unsupported by science.

For longer than any of us can remember, the alternative herbal medication industry has been another racket. A huge laundry list of herbs such as black cohosh, cayenne, echinacea, garlic, ginkgo, ginseng, milk thistle, saw palmetto, St. John’s Wort, and valerian root have been offered up as remedies for nearly any ailment you can imagine. It’s a modern swap for the old west medicine shows in which the “remedies” were typically at least 50 proof.

Now, to be fair, three of these actually may show a little scientific promise. Current studies show potential from St. John’s Wort in helping symptoms of depression, ginkgo in aiding circulation and perhaps brain function in elderly patients, and saw palmetto in increasing urinary flow. But the majority of herbal remedies show no differences in aiding a galaxy of ailments relative to the effect from a placebo.

Moreover, herbal remedies are unregulated by the FDA. And most importantly, these plant products contain hundreds or thousands of chemical compounds, many of which could be very damaging, particularly over time. Although a certain segment of the population swoons when they hear the words “all natural,” they ought to remember that most toxins are produced by plants, and the foliage in a typical backyard is loaded with enough poisons to kill off the whole neighborhood.

Anyway, clearly people will want their herbs and pay dearly for them, even if they don’t really do anything.

But there’s an upside. Several plants, science is showing, hold great promise for being exceptionally loaded with potentially special health benefits, aside from their ordinary nutritional value. Let’s take two, broccoli and green tea. This is not marketing BS, here, folks, but science.

First, broccoli. As you know, your planet is full of carcinogens (cancer causing agents) such as microbes, ultraviolet radiation, cosmic rays, and various chemicals like PCBs, arsenic, radon, and so on. And, oh yeah — tobacco. What’s missing in your diet, however, may be the most important link to cancer prevention. Naturally occurring phytochemicals appear to be anticarcinogens, and one strong source of them is broccoli (and some other cruciferous vegetables: cauliflower, cabbage, and so on).

This class of vegetables contains compounds called dithiolethiones such as sulforaphane, abundant in broccoli, that act in animals by activating the production of enzymes in the liver that inhibit or destroy cancerous cells.

And then there’s green tea. If you’re a tea drinker and you know what’s good for you, you’ll steer clear of black tea and drink green tea instead. Green tea contains compounds called cathechins, particularly epigallocatechin gallate. Cancerous cells need certain enzymes in order to metastasize. One of these is called urokinase, and recent studies show that cathechins inhibit it and prevent the spread of cancerous cells throughout the body.

The problem with black tea, which most American tea drinkers drink, is that it’s fermented, which destroys the epigallocatechin gallate and thus the anti-cancer effect. So stick with green tea, folks.

And stick with science for your explanations of what’s good for you on this little planet called Earth. Stay away from the advertising and marketing.

Want to leave a comment on this blog post?
Login or register for an account to join our online community today!
  • Hey Dave,

    I'm glad to see someone talk about these "hypes" that are going on in today's market for no other reason than to get your money, with virtually no return on your investment. As a practicing Optometrist of 35 years I have seen many such "hypes" sold to supposedly cure cataracts, glaucoma, nearsightedness and many other visual problems. And so far not one of them has ever cured or prevented a thing, all they've done is given false hope and drained pockets.

    The discussions you are having lately about the "empty" energy drinks and now the "near worthless" herbal cures are excellent. People buy too much hype for too little reason! Keep up the good work!

    Steve

  • I love a good cigar to help forget all the loopy beliefs out there(such as a 6000 year old Earth). I guess I should accompany the smoke with a glass of green tea.

  • Dave, I agree with you that there has not been enough scientific research in the US on the effects (positive and negative) of herbal, dietary, and other alternative and complementary medicines.  As you say, the lack of regulation and accountability has led to some unscrupulous or ill-informed practitioners prescribing ineffective or even harmful treatments.  But this is not the fault of the herbs themselves!  Rather, because full-plant herbal treatments cannot be patented, there's not much money to be made from them.  The pharmaceutical industry prefers to identify "active ingredients" which can be isolated, patented, and sold at a hefty profit.  

    Solid scientific research has been done on herbal medicines in Europe.  The German and British herbal pharmacopeias are reliable and comprehensive.  Interestingly, both Germany and Great Britain have universal public health care systems that strive to provide effective treatments while keeping costs down, rather than a for-profit system like we have in the US.  

    From a holistic perspective, there is support for the belief that the full "natural" complement of chemicals present in a whole plant preparation will be more effective and have fewer harmful side effects than a refined single substance.  Remember that plants and animals, including humans, have co-evolved over billions of years, and that humans have been using herbal medicine throughout history.  This is not to say that modern chemical pharmaceuticals (90 percent of which are derived from plants or synthetic analogues of phytochemicals) are bad.  If you have an acute infection, see your doctor and take antibiotics.  But for the prevention and management of the sorts of chronic illnesses that are caused by our unhealthy modern lifestyle, herbal medicines are often more effective than more refined pharmaceuticals.  

    (P.S.  Neither your blog post nor my response seem to have much to do with astronomy.)  

Bad science alert: Your planet’s plants, good and bad