Reader Forums
Astronomy forums are FREE. If you wish to participate you must LOGIN | REGISTER.

Cosmology

Is the Mystery of Dark energy & Antigravity Solved?
Last post 05-27-2009 03:07 AM by stonewallnz. 2 replies.
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
  • 03-07-2009 01:32 AM

    Is the Mystery of Dark energy & Antigravity Solved?

    Please tell me as i need help

    Signature
    I love Jeremiah Horrocks & Isaac newton and therefore i have put the picture of JEREMIAH HORROCKS as my avatar.
    I like Astronomy, Philosophy, Theology, Cosmology, Mathematics, Physics, Astrobiology, Astrophysics & Astrogeology
  • 03-07-2009 08:12 AM In reply to

    Re: Is the Mystery of Dark energy & Antigravity Solved?

    Despite some of the posts you may read in the Cosmology Forum here, this mystery has not yet been solved -- at least not in the sense that working cosmologists have adopted as a working model.

    Rather than start another such lengthy discussion here, I'll leave you to read some of those other threads.

    Signature
    The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine. --- JBS Haldane
  • 05-27-2009 03:07 AM In reply to

    Re: Is the Mystery of Dark energy & Antigravity Solved?

    Short answer: no. Astronomers, some years ago now, discovered the Universe is not only expanding, but the expansion is accelerating. This was unexpected and involved energy the universe does not appear to have, or something is wrong with our understanding of the physics of the universe. The best theory we have of the main force involved is the General Relativity theory of Albert Einstein, which has been so successful physicists have little choice but to keep it, even if it needs amendment. When Einstein first put it forward, in 1915, he did not know of the (uniform or otherwise) expansion of the universe, which his theory actually predicted! He therefore added an unnecessary factor (the Cosmological Constant) into his equations to make the universe not expand or contract. He later described this as his "greatest blunder", and totally rejected it. When scientists add an idea into a theory so it will fit the data, even though there is no theoretical need, it is called an ad hoc hypothesis. Sometimes these lead to good physics and a breakthrough; sometimes they provide a way of scientists keeping incorrect theories they are attached to. The trick is deciding whether the "dark energy" hypothesis is a useless (and obstructive) ad hoc hypothesis, or if it is a brilliant solution to an unexpected observation.

    Personally I dont know. I do think an open mind and scientific attitudes are essential at exciting times like this!  I think in some strange way we are into another really fun time in astronomy.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2009 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems