<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Astroimage processing</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/45.aspx</link><description>How to turn a good image into a great one. Ask a question, learn about software, or share your techinques and tips for processing astrophotography.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: Stacking Parameters in DeepSkyStacker</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389603.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:49:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:389603</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389603.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=389603</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;i tried experimenting a bit more here, stacking in &amp;#39;mosaic&amp;#39; mode might be a better option, from what i gather, i get more detail using maximun enthropy on nebs, but NOT for clusters and globs, i just use the median here- also, it seems bicubic for alignment is the best choice &amp;#39;so far&amp;#39;- im not sure which calibration i prefer yet, but to tell you the truth, you WILL get a different final changing the parameters&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Stacking Parameters in DeepSkyStacker</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389076.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:42:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:389076</guid><dc:creator>tkerr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389076.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=389076</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Additionally, be careful when using the drizzle feature.&amp;nbsp;Especially if you&amp;#39;re using large DSLR RAW images.&amp;nbsp; Using the drizzle will make them very large using up a lot of memory when you go to process it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have A Nice ____________&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Stacking Parameters in DeepSkyStacker</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389040.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:37:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:389040</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/389040.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=389040</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;im still experimenting myself, i did do a comparison of all of them on a some DSO and noticed an improvement on a couple- i cant say for sure which now because the images were on this comp before my hard drive crashed- so i lost them, the help file explains which and each everyone does, id suggest take a DSO- then process it with all them, then compare- just dont use the Max&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Stacking Parameters in DeepSkyStacker</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/388811.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:58:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:388811</guid><dc:creator>tkerr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/388811.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=388811</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m still in the experimental stages with DSS, so I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;m going to be much help to you..&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;I suppose that depends on what object, how much data(frames) and the quality of data collected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have the time and patience try different things and see how they work.&amp;nbsp; Whatever you do don&amp;#39;t make any luminance, color&amp;nbsp;or other adjustments using DSS prior to saving your image to file.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Use a stand alone program dedicated to image processing and manipulation. I use DSS to stack, save image to a file name of my choice with&amp;nbsp;changes embedded, then&amp;nbsp;complete my processing in Photoshop.&amp;nbsp;That&amp;#39;s where the real magic is done. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have A Nice __________&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stacking Parameters in DeepSkyStacker</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/388804.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:27:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:388804</guid><dc:creator>Boise_Dob</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/388804.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=388804</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;For those of you that use DeekSkyStacker, what stacking methods do you prefer and why?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>