<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Astroimage processing</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/45.aspx</link><description>How to turn a good image into a great one. Ask a question, learn about software, or share your techinques and tips for processing astrophotography.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/364183.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:37:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:364183</guid><dc:creator>wwwjeffantantiscom</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/364183.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=364183</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Try a book called Photoshop Astronomy by Scott Ireland. It tech heavy and not for &amp;quot;quick fix&amp;quot; types.But it makes art out of your blurry unprocessed pics, well worth the price (30 buck I think)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358647.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:358647</guid><dc:creator>CFB</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358647.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=358647</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;If you would like to do Photoshop style processing, but don&amp;#39;t want to pay the high price, try GIMP at http://www.gimp.org/.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358609.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:10:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:358609</guid><dc:creator>northernlights</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358609.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=358609</wfw:commentRss><description>Now I know what you mean... amazing what you can do with those programmes!</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358464.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:57:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:358464</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358464.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=358464</wfw:commentRss><description>well i mean in photoshop, it can do unworldly final adjustments,- curves, levels, saturation, color balance- etc etc, by ATN&amp;#39;s and 8bf files i mean PS add-ons, heres an example on an ATN set (action) &lt;a href="http://actions.home.att.net/Astronomy_Tools.html"&gt;http://actions.home.att.net/Astronomy_Tools.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; photoshop has a high learning curve- but learning the basics is pretty simple</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358455.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:35:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:358455</guid><dc:creator>northernlights</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358455.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=358455</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have never touched Photoshop so please bear with me...I still don&amp;#39;t know what&amp;nbsp;are those tools to tweak the image...and what are ATN&amp;#39;s and 8bf files?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358147.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:53:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:358147</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/358147.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=358147</wfw:commentRss><description>it just gives you more tools to tweak the final image with (Photoshop)- you also have ATN&amp;#39;s and 8bf files you can add for added tweaks- i usually just stack with DSS and then throw it in PS- i also got images plus and Maxim DL for stacking, but i prefer the efficientcy and simplicity of DSS</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357956.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:36:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357956</guid><dc:creator>northernlights</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357956.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357956</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tasco&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I looked at DSS but am still with Registax for the moment. I found that I could enhance the color of M8(for example) by the &amp;quot;saturation&amp;quot; option. What do you mean by final processing? I know that some people use Photoshop etc but just what does it do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357564.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357564</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357564.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357564</wfw:commentRss><description>main a idea with stacking is getting a better S/N ratio- this allows you to further stretch the image- read over the DSS help files, it has examples in it- what do you use to final process the image? neither DSS or R4 can do this</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357437.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:24:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357437</guid><dc:creator>northernlights</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357437.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357437</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks guys. I looked up DSS.&amp;nbsp; You are right, DSS and I guess, Registax are used to&amp;nbsp; increase the signal to noise ratio only. The author of DSS states clearly that it does not increase brightness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am still puzzled by the word &amp;quot;stack&amp;quot; which seems to imly &amp;quot;add&amp;quot;. If the same pixel in three photographs receives respectively 9, 10 and 11 photons, the stack it seems&amp;nbsp;responds to 10 photons, not 30. Indeed random noise will be less important in the result. But is it not really an average rather than a stack? Or is my reasoning all wrong?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway I hope that with reduced noise I can stretch histograms etc to take advantage of the &amp;quot;stacking&amp;quot; and brighten my images.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357162.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357162</guid><dc:creator>tasco-60mm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357162.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357162</wfw:commentRss><description>use DSS, you can&amp;nbsp;put the final image in R4 a little bit and play with layers function and linear stretch</description></item><item><title>Re: processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357088.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:13:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357088</guid><dc:creator>kickworm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357088.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357088</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Although I&amp;#39;ve never used it myself, I&amp;#39;ve seen other people post about &lt;a href="http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html"&gt;DeepSkyStacker&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe you can give that one a try? From what I understand, stacking&amp;#39;s main purpose is to reduce the noise in the image. Have you tried adjusting your exposure times? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry I couldn&amp;#39;t be of more help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joe &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>processing galaxies with registax</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357054.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:16:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:357054</guid><dc:creator>northernlights</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/357054.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=45&amp;PostID=357054</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I was under the impression that programmes such as registax could be used to stack photos of faint objects in order to produce a brighter image. I am using a Canon Rebel digital camera which produces JPEG images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The loading and processing with registax v4 went fine.&amp;nbsp; But the stacked image is not any brighter than the original ones. What should I do next?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the end of the processing, the cropping feature is available but not the &amp;quot;View full image&amp;quot; option which would help if one wants to crop the image.&amp;nbsp;At least&amp;nbsp;the &amp;quot;View full image&amp;quot; option&amp;nbsp;was available at the beginning&amp;nbsp; of the process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any help would be appreciated&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>