<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Your astrophotos</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/38.aspx</link><description>Whether you are just getting started or have been shooting the sky for years, post your latest astrophotos here or &lt;a href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/photos/"&gt;submit them to our Online Reader Gallery.&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377842.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:377842</guid><dc:creator>NCTiger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377842.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=377842</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Worked on Virgo galaxies again last night.&amp;nbsp; Used a Canon 200mm f/2.8L lens on the 40D for some widefield shots.&amp;nbsp; Was able to get seven Messier galaxies (and a number of NGC and IC galaxies)&amp;nbsp;on one frame - stacked 10 subs at 85 secs with four darks and two flats:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH:950px;HEIGHT:941px;" height="941" src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880VirgoCluster-7-galaxies-050.jpg" width="950" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377475.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:13:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:377475</guid><dc:creator>NCTiger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377475.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=377475</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Did some additional imaging last night of a portion of the Virgo Cluster - centered on M-58.&amp;nbsp; Picked up several more Messier galaxies and several NGC galaxies.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH:950px;HEIGHT:697px;" height="697" src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880Virgo-Galaxies---Annotated.jpg" width="950" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s the negative - some of the smaller galaxies show up better:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH:950px;HEIGHT:697px;" height="697" src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880Virgo-Galaxies---Negative.jpg" width="950" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377250.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:39:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:377250</guid><dc:creator>NCTiger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/377250.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=377250</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Starwolf - have a moderate light pollution problem from my backyard, difficult to get to a&amp;nbsp;dark sky site - hoping to do so this weekend.&amp;nbsp; That should help darken the background somewhat.&amp;nbsp; In the meantime, I set up last night in my backyard and did a wider field shot of the Markarian&amp;#39;s Chain.&amp;nbsp; Used a 300mm lens on my Canon 40D at f/4.0 and ISO800.&amp;nbsp; Stacked five 4 minute subs with two darks and two flats in DSS.&amp;nbsp; Used the Hutech light pollution suppression filter on the camera.&amp;nbsp; &lt;img style="WIDTH:955px;HEIGHT:688px;" height="688" src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880Makarian_sChain-04282008.jpg" width="955" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376950.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376950</guid><dc:creator>Starwolf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376950.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376950</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice indeed. All you really need to do is darken up the background a smidgin&amp;#39;. I think it is an excellent shot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This area is indeed Markarian&amp;#39;s chain (It starts with M84). It&amp;#39;s approx 60 million LY distant. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376911.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:58:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376911</guid><dc:creator>NCTiger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376911</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Do you know the name of that chain of galaxies in your picture? &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe it&amp;#39;s a portion of Markarian&amp;#39;s Chain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Why are you using ISO 1600? &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Unless you&amp;nbsp;are taking your images in pristine dark skies&amp;nbsp;avoid using such a high ISO.&amp;nbsp; An ISO of 400&amp;nbsp;will yield much less noise and won&amp;#39;t wash out as quick.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Force of habit I guess.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;d been imaging with no guiding for several months, so I used the highest ISO to take the shortest exposures. I&amp;#39;m beginning to get the hang of auto-guiding, so I should be able to back off on the ISO.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ll try the 400 speed at my next opportunity (if we ever get clear skies in this part of western N.C. again!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment and suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376903.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:26:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376903</guid><dc:creator>tkerr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376903.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376903</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice shot, one of my favorite areas to obsereve. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That is only a portion of a chain of galaxies which is only a small portion of the Virgo cluster of galaxies.&amp;nbsp; Do you know the name of that chain of galaxies in your picture? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I may ask a question and make a little suggestion; Why are you using ISO 1600? &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Unless you&amp;nbsp;are taking your images in pristine dark skies&amp;nbsp;avoid using such a high ISO.&amp;nbsp; An ISO of 400&amp;nbsp;will yield much less noise and won&amp;#39;t wash out as quick.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;At ISO 400 you will be able to take a couple longer exposure without getting too much noise or LP wash out, then a bunch of shorter exposures to stack together.&amp;nbsp; Everytime I try anything&amp;nbsp;ISO&amp;nbsp;800 or 1600 it&amp;#39;s too noisy and grainy looking. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have A Nice __________&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virgo Cluster</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376889.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:49:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376889</guid><dc:creator>NCTiger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376889.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376889</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I imaged M-84, M-86 and friends a few nights ago between clouds and tree branches.&amp;nbsp; Used the Canon 40D at ISO1600&amp;nbsp;through an 80mm Stellarvue Nighthawk II,&amp;nbsp;a W.O. 66 mm guidescope, Orion Starshoot autoguider, all mounted on a CG-5.&amp;nbsp; Moderate light pollution, so used a light pollution suppression filter.&amp;nbsp; Series of exposures ranging from 90 seconds to 210 seconds stacked in DSS and processed in PSE4.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH:800px;HEIGHT:599px;" height="599" src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880VirgoCluster-04222008-_2.jpg" width="800" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Needs considerable improvement.&amp;nbsp; Same scene in APOD for today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080425.html"&gt;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080425.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>