<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Your astrophotos</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/38.aspx</link><description>Whether you are just getting started or have been shooting the sky for years, post your latest astrophotos here or &lt;a href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/photos/"&gt;submit them to our Online Reader Gallery.&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: i gave the LPI a second chance.....best saturn to date...</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376194.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:41:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376194</guid><dc:creator>WABarry</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376194.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376194</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;For the planets, best results are obtained with the combination with a long focal length scope, a 3x [or more powerful] barlow, and a webcam with a fairly high built in magnification.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A video clip of about 60 seconds at 10 fps isn&amp;#39;t too much.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So, you want large scale.....up close and personal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rest comes from the processing.&amp;nbsp; I think &lt;strong&gt;Registax 4&lt;/strong&gt; [free] is awfully hard to beat for aligning, stacking and wavelet processing.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It can really do wonders with a mediocre video clip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is nothing wrong with your image that a little more scale wouldn&amp;#39;t improve.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Focus is of course very important, but &amp;quot;seeing&amp;quot; is probably THE most important.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If the seeing isn&amp;#39;t average or better, wait for another night.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice work!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: i gave the LPI a second chance.....best saturn to date...</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376125.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376125</guid><dc:creator>Doberman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376125.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376125</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Nice pic there Starwolf&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: i gave the LPI a second chance.....best saturn to date...</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376074.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:33:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:376074</guid><dc:creator>Starwolf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/376074.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=376074</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Yo Mo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice pic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s pretty much the same way I get Saturn with about 6 images stacked. (No motor drive). Just my pic is alittle larger...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.joecaggiano.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/saturn03-20-08.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think another 100 exposures would have made a difference. The LPI is pretty much touch-n-go with how the images come out. The pic looks good (detail wise). I would probably recommend a barlow in the 3x range to increase image size.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>i gave the LPI a second chance.....best saturn to date...</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/375554.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:375554</guid><dc:creator>MoFoYa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/375554.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=38&amp;PostID=375554</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;maybe i&amp;#39;m just not using the LPI to it&amp;#39;s fullest potential, but i can never get great results with it.&amp;nbsp; (i got a really bad mars with it last time i tried!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;anyhow, i thought i&amp;#39;d give saturn a go tonight.&amp;nbsp; i&amp;#39;ve imaged saturn a couple of times before; the LPI actually did pretty good.&amp;nbsp; the seeing was average, and i seem to be having dificulty determining best focus (magic eye!?! where&amp;#39;s the magic?&lt;img src="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/emoticons/icon_smile_newlaugh.gif" alt="Laugh" /&gt;)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is my best saturn so far, so i can&amp;#39;t talk too badly about it.&amp;nbsp; this one is 100 images through my 8&amp;quot; F/10.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q:&amp;nbsp; would another 100 have made much difference?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh75/mofoya/saturn2ps.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>