http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/27.aspxenCommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/420271.aspxMon, 29 Jun 2009 23:58:56 GMT5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:420271DaveMitsky0http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/420271.aspxhttp://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=420271<p>The information presented at this site - <a href="http://astrophysics.suite101.com/article.cfm/steady_state_cosmology">http://astrophysics.suite101.com/article.cfm/steady_state_cosmology</a>&nbsp;- may be helpful.</p> <p>Dave Mitsky</p>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/420037.aspxFri, 26 Jun 2009 03:09:07 GMT5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:420037lowry0http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/420037.aspxhttp://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=420037<p>I&#39;ve read a bit about the Steady State theory, and one thing I can&#39;t understand is how they explained what the universe would have looked like aaaaages ago. Steady State theorists accepted the expanding universe, obviously, but if you went back far enough, wouldn&#39;t everything come to a single point anyway, as in the Big Bang theory? I just don&#39;t get it.<br /></p>