<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Cosmology</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/20.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: Has this Puzzle been solved?</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416130.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:416130</guid><dc:creator>Star Dragon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416130.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=416130</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;HI Chip,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for responding, I have made a few queries into this puzzle when I came across this statement that refutes lensing and that the quasar is in fact contained in the galaxy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the source (quasar) is very far away, then in order to produce strong gravitational lensing, one needs a surface density larger than, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://home.comcast.net/%7Edmill1220/pwpimages/Quasar%207319.jpg%20formula%20for%20lensing.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A nearby face-on spiral, unless it&amp;#39;s extremely massive, won&amp;#39;t be able to produce this, so it won&amp;#39;t produce multiple-image gravitational lensing. There will be weak lensing effects in the source, but unlike with galaxy sources, a quasar point-source image won&amp;#39;t be distorted by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;The Galaxy is too opaque at the quasar&amp;#39;s position to allow background light through.&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also found this, &lt;a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409215"&gt;http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409215&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ok the further I dig, the more confusing this becomes, there are many&amp;nbsp; different papers with different conclusions, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is another one, &lt;strike&gt;http://creation.com/bye-bye-big-bang&lt;/strike&gt;, I am not trying to persuade anyone against the BBT, I actually accept it, although with&amp;nbsp;many&amp;nbsp;questions,&amp;nbsp;still there seems to be contention and the matter is not solved, can you point me to other papers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit: strike&amp;nbsp;my last link out, it has to do with creationism and they cite a religious quote, thats a No&amp;nbsp;No in my book you can&amp;#39;t mix both.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find this rather disturbing, According to Harp, it is interacting with NGC 7913, and not lensed or seen through a hole.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have not been able to find any papers that conclude that there is a massive jet from this quasar&amp;nbsp;far away that is interacting with NGC7913&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit: I imaged this galaxy with my meager equipment with poor results Stephans Quintet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://home.comcast.net/%7Edmill1220/NGC7320%207319%207317%281%29.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Has this Puzzle been solved?</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416118.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:57:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:416118</guid><dc:creator>chipdatajeffB</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416118.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=416118</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I think if you dig around via Google you&amp;#39;ll find refereed papers showing that the quasar is much more distant than the galaxy and that the galaxy is emitting X rays where the jet from the quasar intersects it, throwing off the redshift calculations greatly. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If memory serves, once the Chandra orbiting X-ray observatory came online, several&amp;nbsp;Seyfert galaxy puzzles like this one began to fall by the wayside. The &lt;em&gt;news&lt;/em&gt; is that this interaction between jets and intervening galaxies had not been expected, at least the extent of the interaction was unexpected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This particular galaxy is one of the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; trio among what we normally call Stephan&amp;#39;s Quintet (the other two primary galaxies being at much different distances and, therefore, not gravitationally interacting). There is a lot of interesting stuff happening in this region.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Has this Puzzle been solved?</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416117.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:34:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:416117</guid><dc:creator>Star Dragon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/416117.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=416117</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I ran across this article in the Science daily that was written back in 2005, it shows something that casts doubt on the redshift interpretations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone here have any further data on this anomaly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the article is approximately 4 yrs old, surely by now,&amp;nbsp;someone may just have cracked this riddle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050111115201.htm"&gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050111115201.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>