<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Accessories</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/12.aspx</link><description>Eyepieces, mounts, and more</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/397454.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:51:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:397454</guid><dc:creator>nfredrick2002</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/397454.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=397454</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to hear about your shipping issues. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I think you will be very happy with the 10 inch. I&amp;#39;ve had my LXD55&amp;nbsp; now for about 3 years and I&amp;#39;m very happy with it, perfect it&amp;#39;s not but a very, very good scope for the price. I also have a 12 1/2 dob that I built myself and I must say the LXD is seeing more use than the 12 &amp;quot;.I&amp;#39;m very pleased with the images seen with the 10 &amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; and have taken some pics with it and a DSI. Imaging with it is a challenge because of the mount and a trial in patience but you can see some of the pics I&amp;#39;ve taken with it here. They aren&amp;#39;t the best in the world but do show what you can do without a lot of effort.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; http://picasaweb.google.com/ntfredrick/ASTRO#&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (most of the ones at the bottom of the screen taken with the LXD 10)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://picasaweb.google.com/ntfredrick/Comets# &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of the pics of comet Holmes were taken with it and I am quite pleased with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m still learning as I go along with the scope and hope to find the time this winter to take the mount apart to help with some of the backlash issues in the geartrain. I may upgrade it to a belt drive setup to eliminate the spur gears but we will wait and see what improvement I get with the reduced&amp;nbsp; backlash&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some improvements I&amp;#39;ve done, replaced the stock finder, added a motor onto the stock focuser, purchased an adapter with a compression ring for the focuser, added a cooling fan and recently added a red dot finder which I find to be a big help&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LXD55telescopes/photos/album/1016441891/pic/list &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may want to hop over here to see what they have to say about it as many members have the LXD75 also&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LXD55telescopes/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Norm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/397428.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:397428</guid><dc:creator>RwAs</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/397428.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=397428</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I am interested in your comment about the Meade Rep advising the mount had been changed for the Sn10. I am currently engaged in the famous decision the the 8 or the 10. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was not aware the focuser was upgraded either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I would appreciate any information you can offer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396922.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:19:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396922</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396922.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396922</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks JJ. I didn&amp;#39;t see that one. Makes me wonder though if the writer didn&amp;#39;t get the 2007 upgrades. As he talks about &amp;quot;buy a good used scope&amp;quot;. He doesn&amp;#39;t make it clear if it were new or used. And again, if it was new.... how long was that one sitting on the shelf? The Meade salesperson I spoke with said that the upgraded models were released in 2007 - but gave no definite date. Oh well.
Murph</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396902.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:07:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396902</guid><dc:creator>roverich</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396902.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396902</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;That sucks about your new scope . I&amp;nbsp;had to deal with UPS almost every day , and there claim service really is a pain in the tail . Just because the box wasent damaged during shipping dosent mean the box wasent dropped . they sell G shock indicators for shipping of delicate items and meade should adopt this policy for shipping . basicly if the box is rough handled it will tell you .&amp;nbsp;They are not expensive at all , about a dollar each and 1 placed inside of the carton , and a g shock indicator warning label on the outside of the carton&amp;nbsp;is all it takes for assurance of safe handeling of the package . the shipping company sees these are installed and useualy handles the carton with kid gloves . that is what is scary for new scope purchaces . i.e. me . I plan on taking a trip to the closest astronomy store &amp;lt;65 miles away&amp;gt;whene i purchace my lxd 75 8acf . any way good luck with your new scope and clear skys........ roverich&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396900.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:15:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396900</guid><dc:creator>johnjohnson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396900.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396900</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Murphy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last review there was from 7/14/2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;Overall Rating:&lt;/b&gt; 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Optics:&lt;/b&gt;9 &lt;b&gt;Ease of Use:&lt;/b&gt;8 &lt;b&gt;Value:&lt;/b&gt;10 &lt;br /&gt;
Weight: 5 (&lt;a href="http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/showlevels.php" class="votelevel"&gt;Veritable Vote&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
Date: 07/14/2007 10:41:51 am PST&lt;br /&gt;
By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.35.136) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JJ&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396898.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:07:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396898</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396898.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396898</wfw:commentRss><description>Those reviews prove my point. All of them were from 2005. I haven&amp;#39;t seen a review since the spotting scope was replaced and updated along with the mount, and the extra weights added in 2007. Pre 2007 - Meade only included one 10 lb weight. Now it&amp;#39;s 30 lbs.
murph</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396890.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:23:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396890</guid><dc:creator>johnjohnson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396890.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396890</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Here are some reviews of the SN10.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/entryvotes.php?sectionid=12&amp;amp;entryid=575"&gt;&amp;nbsp;http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/entryvotes.php?sectionid=12&amp;amp;entryid=575&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396888.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:34:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396888</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396888.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396888</wfw:commentRss><description>Oh yes - I forgot to mention that I intend to put a JMI focuser on the OPT early next year. They have a unit that &amp;quot;bolts right on - no drilling required&amp;quot;. Though it &amp;quot;seems&amp;quot; that Meade has made a couple of changes to the OEM focuser... the knobs seem much nicer than previous photos I&amp;#39;ve seen. I can&amp;#39;t say that the movement/gearing is better though. Once I get the OPT back... I&amp;#39;ll let you know.
Murph</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396887.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:32:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396887</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396887.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396887</wfw:commentRss><description>Tim -
you and Astronig are absolutely right. I took all of these variables into account before I bought the scope. But let me tell both of you something that I haven&amp;#39;t found anywhere on the web.... Meade upgraded the LXD75-SN10 mount and weight system in 2007. The mount is a new beefy mount and the scope comes with 3 - 10lb weights exclusively in the SN-10. I looked and looked for a review of a post 2007 SN-10 and never found one. So I took the advice of a Meade salesperson at their 800 number. Aperture is everything for me. So I gave a great deal of consideration to &amp;quot;breeze shake&amp;quot;. Fortunately I have a built in wind screen at my scope setup area. I live in a nicely dark area... and a few years ago I poured a 16x20 concrete pad to put a Hot Tub on for my wife. I then built a six foot privacy fence completely around it. Well.. it turns out that &amp;quot;HOT&amp;quot; water aggravates a skin condition my wife has... and I really never used it. So I sold the hot tub, and was left with a GREAT area for setting up a scope! (no... this was never the plan ; ).  Eventually I&amp;#39;m thinking about drilling and bolting down onto the concrete a permanent column for the eq mount. But again... I just really want to get this opt issue resolved. I&amp;#39;ve been out of Astronomy since college where I took several semesters of Astro-Physicss under Dr. Steve Danford at UNCG. I just recently had the wherewithal (i.e. finances) to purchase the LXD (my favorite type of scope). My first &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; scope I had was in 1992 - an original ETX. Now that the kids are a little older - they&amp;#39;ve taken an interest in the skies, and I can&amp;#39;t wait to share everything with them. Again gents.... THANKS for the help!
Murphy</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396873.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:39:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396873</guid><dc:creator>tkerr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396873.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396873</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="/asycs/Themes/astronomy2007/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;astronig:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hey Murphy , You might think about the SN8 as I have heard quite a bit about the 10 incher being too much tube for the mount . I was originally concidering the 10 inch myself but went with the 8 due to these reports . Just a thought as I know that aperture rules but if it renders the mount so unstable it can be a real pain .&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For visual use a 10&amp;quot; Newtonian on a LXD 75 is pushing the limits but wouldn&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;be that serious of a problem. Same would be true with&amp;nbsp;a 10&amp;quot; Newtonian on any of those&amp;nbsp;class of&amp;nbsp;mounts&amp;nbsp;including the Celestron&amp;nbsp;CG5, and Orion Sky View Pro and Atlas Mounts etc..&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Using it for astrophotography would be a completely different story. Although some people have been able to use the successfully for astrophotography you would need very calm weather.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s not so much that they are pushing the weight limits of the mount, it&amp;#39;s the cross section of the OTA that is exposed to the wind.&amp;nbsp; It doesn&amp;#39;t take much of a breeze to&amp;nbsp;get it to shake or vibrate. Some people might even say a 8&amp;quot; Newtonian would have&amp;nbsp;similar issues with wind, but would still be more stable because it does weigh less.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396868.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:59:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396868</guid><dc:creator>astronig</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396868.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396868</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hey Murphy , You might think about the SN8 as I have heard quite a bit about the 10 incher being too much tube for the mount . I was originally concidering the 10 inch myself but went with the 8 due to these reports . Just a thought as I know that aperture rules but if it renders the mount so unstable it can be a real pain . The stock focusers on the SN series are quite hard to use as the sweet spot on a fast scope is very small &amp;amp; it doesn&amp;#39;t snap right into focus . As a matter of fact it takes some patience mostly at high power where the movement of the scope &amp;amp; lateral slop that the stock focusers have on these scopes causing lots of image shift can make it a trying task . If your handy with a good mechanical aptitude you may be able to improve on this focuser some with a little bit of modification but most SN owners will eventually upgrade the it to a Crayford style dual speed unit . &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Dave &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/emoticons/icon_smile_cool.gif" alt="Cool" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;P.S.&amp;nbsp; Glad you got the card company to back you up as you should not have to wait &amp;amp; put up with lousy excuses from Optics Planet .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396851.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:37:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396851</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396851.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396851</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks guys. I greatly appreciate the advice. Friday - when I talked to Optics Planet - they said &amp;quot;we&amp;#39;re filing a UPS claim ... &amp;quot;You&amp;#39;ll get your money back when UPS pays the claim&amp;quot;. I plan on calling Optics Planet on Monday again, and talk with someone in Management. I agree with you guys... they should own up and send me a UPS pick up ticket and take the scope back. It wasn&amp;#39;t UPS&amp;#39;s fault. Definitely a Meade slip up. I&amp;#39;ll tell you this.. I called my Credit Card company and filed a dispute against Optics Planet. They agreed that it sounded like OP was trying to &amp;quot;pass the buck&amp;quot;.  So they credited my account and said I wouldn&amp;#39;t be charged for the order... and that it&amp;#39;s now OP&amp;#39;s problem to solve... not mine. Can&amp;#39;t beat that.  But still I&amp;#39;m without a Scope. And I&amp;#39;m still sold on the LXD75 10&amp;quot; after even getting a bum scope. It&amp;#39;s a good deal for the money. The problem is Meade told me they&amp;#39;re on backorder. So as you mentioned.... I&amp;#39;ll be waiting a long time. Thanks for the support. I needed to hear this. Thank God I haven&amp;#39;t touched the scope! I figured it would mess up the warranty.. thus it&amp;#39;s been hands off.
I&amp;#39;ll keep you up to date if anyone&amp;#39;s interested.  Think of me when theres clear skies.
Murphy</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396842.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396842</guid><dc:creator>astronig</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396842.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396842</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;I wouldn&amp;#39;t touch that scope as it will void any warrantee if done so . That mirror should have 3 retaining clips &amp;amp; not be glued in . If Optics planet has any feel for what customer service is all about they should take care of the problem for you . They deal with Meade all the time and should replace your tube A.S.A.P so as you can go about using the product that you have already paid for . They can send the defective tube back to Meade as Meade should be responsible for the unchecked unit being shipped in the first place . If there was no sign of damage to the shipping carton apon arrival to your location it isn&amp;#39;t any fault of U.P.S. Make your retailer provide the customer service that you deserve . You are Optics Planets customer &amp;amp; Optics Planet is Meades customer . Like a chain of command . Don&amp;#39;t let your retailer pawn the problem off to you . If they don&amp;#39;t agree with this I would just tell them you will return the product for a refund in full &amp;amp; give them a bad review as an atronomical equipment supplier on every astronomy related site you can find . If you deal with Meade direct I can almost guarrantee you wont be viewing for a couple months . Tell Optics planet you want a replacement or a refund . You paid for a new scope &amp;amp; don&amp;#39;t want one that&amp;#39;s repaired .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396840.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:38:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396840</guid><dc:creator>tkerr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396840.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396840</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I can understand the frustration especially when you&amp;#39;ve been anxiously&amp;nbsp;waiting to use the telescope, however, since it is still under warranty I do not suggest any self repairing of any kind that might void your warranty.&amp;nbsp; Your best option is to allow Meade to take care of it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;With that said,&amp;nbsp; Good Luck.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;IMHO, Optics Planet should take responsibility, replace it and file their own claim with UPS.&amp;nbsp; either way you&amp;#39;re going to be waiting.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Help/Advice on Repair of Meade LXD75 10-SN Damaged in Shipping</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396836.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:43:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:396836</guid><dc:creator>MurphyPeoples</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/thread/396836.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=396836</wfw:commentRss><description>Hey all. First post, as I need some serious advice from Scope Builders/ Repair Guru&amp;#39;s. I just received my Meade LXD75 10&amp;quot;. Two of the three collimation screws were NOT in the Collimation Plate upon arrival. Not that big of a deal to me... I figure I&amp;#39;d wrap light weight picture frame wire around the bolts... pull them close enough to get the knobs screwed on and viola! That part is a not brainer.

The serious part is that the MIRROR ITSELF has slightly pulled away by about 1/4&amp;quot; from one side of the plate (that I think it&amp;#39;s glued to). 

As you old Meade LXD hands know... Meade says DO NOT remove the main housing. I called Optics Planet where I bought the scope... they just want to blame UPS and file a claim (I got the scope Wednesday of this week). I called Meade and they said &amp;quot;Ship it to us for Repair&amp;quot;. They had no 10&amp;quot; OPT&amp;#39;s in stock to exchange.

So my choice is.... wait for Optics Planet and UPS to work things out or send it to Meade for a couple of weeks for repair - perhaps optics planet would pay for the frieght? 

I just want to view the skies. Having this thing sitting around not being used is KILLING me. 

Anyone think it would hurt to try and pull the mirror back down? I figured I could super glue a small nut to the back of the mirror. Once it dried I could screw a bolt into it and pull it back down on the plate. I don&amp;#39;t know what glue agent Meade uses. I wouldn&amp;#39;t think super glue that close to the edge as it might &amp;quot;haze&amp;quot; the mirror. 
Any experienced advice would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Murphy</description></item></channel></rss>