Reader Forums
Astronomy forums are FREE. If you wish to participate you must LOGIN | REGISTER.

Digital cameras

Includes discussion of web cams and digital video imaging
Adapter for camera
Last post 11-09-2009 04:50 PM by ajohnson. 10 replies.
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
  • 11-03-2009 07:18 PM

    • maryccc
    • Joined on 10-30-2006
    • Newton, NC
    • Posts 655

    Adapter for camera

    What do I need to connect my xsi to a telescope? and where can I get one?  Thanks.

    Signature

  • 11-03-2009 07:32 PM In reply to

    Re: Adapter for camera

     I have the XSi also. Need to know what type of scope you have and also what type of focuser.Minimum you will is a T-ring adapter that would connect the camera to the focuser. The are fairly inexpensive.

    T=ring adapter

    If your scope will accept a 2" adapter then I recommend this one to prevent vignetting.

    2" adapter

    Scroll down to the bottom of the page to find the Canon adapters. Thes are a bit more spendy though.

    JJ

  • 11-04-2009 07:28 PM In reply to

    • maryccc
    • Joined on 10-30-2006
    • Newton, NC
    • Posts 655

    Re: Adapter for camera

    I don't have a scope.  I had one last year but no slr camera.  Now I have an slr camera and not telescope.  What would be the cheapest telescope I could get to get good photos.

    Signature

  • 11-04-2009 08:52 PM In reply to

    Re: Adapter for camera

    Wow Astro Photography is in no way inexpensive. First you need a good optical tube designed for AP. Then you need a guide scope and camera. A sturdy mount to put them on. A laptop or
    PC to control it all! Software to process your images. As you can see things add up in a hurry.

    An optical tube $400

    A guide scope and camera package $410

    A sturdy mount that can be guided $1150

    See right there you already have about 2 grand into just the basics, and this stuff is the minimum you could get away with in my opinion. I under stand peoples enthusiasm to just jump right in and  start taking those beautiful pictures they have been seeing. I have seen in the last 2 years here on this web site a trend of every body thinks they can do AP right out of the box. It takes a lot of determination and money. I won't mention how much frustration goes in to it also. So I am not trying to be negative with you but I am letting you know up front what you are getting in to. If you truly want to do it Then I wish you luck and I admire you enthusiasm. 

    JJ 

    JJ

     

  • 11-05-2009 09:27 AM In reply to

    • maryccc
    • Joined on 10-30-2006
    • Newton, NC
    • Posts 655

    Re: Adapter for camera

    I understand how expensive it is but I took some good shots when I had an advanced point and shoot camera and a cheap tasco.  I might just take moon shots.   What would be a good lens to take shots of the moon.  I will be getting a 55-200mm.  Would I need a 300mm?

    Signature

  • 11-05-2009 09:49 AM In reply to

    • maryccc
    • Joined on 10-30-2006
    • Newton, NC
    • Posts 655

    Re: Adapter for camera

    Here was my first saturn photo I did with a sony cybershot advanced point and shoot and a cheap tasco telescope

    Signature

  • 11-05-2009 11:38 AM In reply to

    Re: Adapter for camera

     Mary

    I guess I misunderstood your AP intentions. With a camera like the XSi, I thought you were leaning towards doing Deep Space Objects. A camera like the XSi, is kind of large and heavy to be shooting Afocal through a telescope eye piece. The cyber shot was probably better suited. If you cam piggy back the camera on an inexpensive telescope and use your 55 - 200 lens you will be able to take some very nice wide field shots. I would say experiment with the lens you have now before making any more monetary expenditures. 

    With even an inexpensive telescope and mount and an Afocal camera bracket, you should be able to get good Moon and planet shots.

    Camera Bracket

    Then with a smaller telescope and mount with "tracking" you could piggy back the camera and take short wide field exposures of the Milkyway. Maybe a scope like this.

     102 mm Scope

    JJ

  • 11-05-2009 12:16 PM In reply to

    • maryccc
    • Joined on 10-30-2006
    • Newton, NC
    • Posts 655

    Re: Adapter for camera

    Thanks those telescopes look nice.  So I would need a tripod for thoose too right.   I don't know about piggy backing.   I think it would take a long time to get into deep space photography.  I'm just interested in the moon and planets right now. 

    Signature

  • 11-05-2009 12:23 PM In reply to

    Re: Adapter for camera

     That Scope is a complete package. It comes with Optical tube, Finder scope, Mount and tripod. All you would need is the camera adapter bracket mentioned earlier.

    JJ

  • 11-05-2009 01:28 PM In reply to

    • tasco-60mm
    • Joined on 06-29-2006
    • alpha cygnuss II delta quadrant
    • Posts 1,593

    Re: Adapter for camera

    you can use a tripod for lunar shots, id suggest a 66mm or 80mm ED to get started, i would get one that has a threaded focuser for a T-adaptor- i dont know what you have in mind for the planets. but they usually require aperature and a long f/l to get anything half decent- but this is using a planetary imager- not a DSLR, so dont get your hopes up very much for that, im afraid your stuck with doing lunar shots from a tripod as it stands right now- the two types of scopes i mentioned with get you started for AP, as long as you have a decent EQ mount

    Signature
    worlds worst photographer
    neanderthal computer skills
    cant stand directions
    http://my.funtrivia.com/private/main.cfm?tid=59481
  • 11-09-2009 04:50 PM In reply to

    • ajohnson
    • Joined on 05-14-2008
    • Riverside, CA
    • Posts 113

    Re: Adapter for camera

    I suggest you read the following post by Tim Kerr.  It sums up what is required for astrophotography quite nicely

    http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/p/19319/302121.aspx

    I also suggest you take the time to learn all the modes of your camera.  In your other post you asked why you couldn't take a picture at night.  You are going to need to switch the mode of your camera to something like "Tv" or manual mode, set the ISO to 400, and the exposure time to around 10-15 seconds.  You won't be able to go any longer until your camera is on some kind of equatorial tracking mount.

     

    Signature
    Aaron Johnson
    8" Coulter Optical Dob,
    4.5" Orion Starblast on (unfinished) roboscoped clone CG5 mount
    4.5"DS-2114 (on goto DS mount, soon to be looking for a new home),
    C-11A XLT on Atlas EQ-G mount
    Canon EOS 40d


Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2009 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems