Reader Forums
Astronomy forums are FREE. If you wish to participate you must LOGIN | REGISTER.

Cosmology

Light's Singular Personality
Last post 06-10-2009 07:49 PM by morbas. 3 replies.
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
  • 06-05-2009 03:30 PM

    Light's Singular Personality

    Material heat transfer and heat capacity is directly scaled by molar count. The nuclear proton/neutron make-up determines the energy wave property of the emissions, not the quantity. Electro-magnetic properties are like wise indexed to the proton/neutron structure, which measured values are tabulated. Any text-book begins with linear equations to derive Electro-magnetic/static/dynamic fields to which tabulated values are applied for design engineering application(s).

    The double split experiment provides a wave-front interference pattern on the target plane. The interference pattern emission is volume related to the intensity levels, and has wavelength determined by the target material. We see emission quantum quantity indexed to the intensity of the wave interference pattern. Heat transfer and interference pattern emissions are the same process. Electron density is not a factor.

    On a large scale, the emission properties appear to be linear. On a small scale they are found to be packets of energy, except that what are we using to see these with but another material exhibiting an equivalent emission; including our human visual receptors.

    Emission quantums (photons) emission rates are proportional to wave front intensity. The molar count controls emission wavelength (not associated with electron density). Association shows that the nucleus is the source of the emissions. I view the nucleus as the EMF causality, and the electron as only an expression of (non-causal to) these properties.

    Now re-read ‘Light’s dual personality’ article.

    Double Slit with light is correct: constructive interference is correct.

    ‘Perspective matters’ at a large scale is a measure of intensity. However, the photon has not been showed to be wavelike and particulate, except particulate based entirely on the nuclear properties. The inference that photons are particles is entirely unfounded.

    ‘Photoelectric Effect’ is the result of Compton effect as predicted by Maxell Equations. These equations based on a calculus with infinite resolution. But, we know that the emission wavelength is controlled by the nucleus neutron/proton structure. Even at high energies, the incoming energy momentum is effected by the nucleus energy emission, and preservation of energy (and momentum) is a law that causes the passing wavefront to assume a red shift and a angular shift. This effect holds for all incoming energy waves (bremstrahlung), which supports a free space hydrogen red shift equal to Hubble measurement.

    1. Light behaves like a pure wave...the photon particle is the result of interaction with a nucleus.
    2. Particle properties are an unsupported interpretation.
    3. Hubble RED shift is Compton, the Universe is not expanding.
    Signature
    Exceptions are pernicious, they conceal laws:H.Poincare'
  • 06-09-2009 11:50 PM In reply to

    A plausible Model?

    I have a model derived from mass ratio of Proton Neutron Electron mass. This derives to the 11th frequency vector equilibrium (neutron) minus seven vertexes (proton). The seven vertex void on the VE provides an electric icosohedron structure (Synergetics, B.Fuller). The VE vertex count is the summation of 10F^2 + 2 from 1 to 11. At frequency (layer) eleven, the total is 5083. Coincidental, if the vector equilibrium models the neutron, then the mass ratio between the neutron (1.6749286(10)E-27 kg) and the proton (1.672623(10)FN1E-27 kg) can be expressed as the vertex volume of the eleventh frequency vector equilibrium minus seven of its spheres to seven significant digits; ERGO, 1.6749286(10)/1.672623(10) = 5083/(5083-7.000). If accurate (based on the neutrons mass) this would further refine a proton’s mass as 1.6726220(10) E-27 kg.

    No other naturally occurring relationship has prime numbers. The atomic short (and powerful) forces shield higher level occurrences from this energy source. Prime numbers are not express naturally in space. The neutron is unstable. It decays to a proton. The decay results in a icoohedron (electron family) that slows time down and gives the proton a half-life greater than the age of the universe. A quantum black hole would slow time and warp space-time, resulting in instantaneous atomic reactions at a distance; Feynman Diagrams.

    The proton's void time space distortion is a covalent force (for completeness), an atomic glue that binds the neutron/proton pair. The covalent force of the proton’s void is like a static charge force field that distributes itself throughout the surface of the proton's sphere. An attached neutron a) increases the surface area of the charge distribution, lowering the net energy, providing an atomic glue energy force binding neutrons to protons, and b) fits with the protons surface void of the icosahedron. A tritium isotope can only share the surface area effect in a), and thus will decay very rapidly. A neutron, bound to a proton, shares the protons time well in proportion to it's isotope decay period. The neutron proton ratio stability table in any Physics Book, consists of three slopes, centered on 12 and 54 vertexes with 92. This stability table may indicate that the icoshedrons tend to gather on the surface, forcing the void distance away from the center, instep with a increasing neutron/proton ratio, and also the higher decay rate of each heavier element.

    Signature
    Exceptions are pernicious, they conceal laws:H.Poincare'
  • 06-10-2009 06:25 AM In reply to

    Re: Light's Singular Personality

    morbas : I like your article, but could you explain to me how you see the interaction between two electrons seperate from the neuclear columb field. Thanks for your time.

    The experiment was the the one in this article http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/e144/nytimes.html, I was wondering if the gamma photon produced,  was a Bremstrahlung, releaced due to electron breaking, or just how you see the interaction between the high energy electrons and result in the production of gamma photons. This is only one example but will illustrate what I'm looking for, Thank you.

  • 06-10-2009 07:49 PM In reply to

    Re: Light's Singular Personality

    Ok, Got it...Space reserved for your reply. Need a bunch of time...

    Static fields do not interact...so electrons do not interact.

    Continuing...

    Signature
    Exceptions are pernicious, they conceal laws:H.Poincare'
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2009 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems