6/24/08 Tuesday, 22:30 EDT
Equipment: 130mm f/8 long tube reflector, 26mm and 6.4mm plossl (39x and 159x, respectively).
The sky was fairly clear for NJ (I could see magnitude 4.5 stars with averted vision, and approx. magnitude 4.3 stars directly at maybe 45 deg. up from the horizon) so I took a stroll out with the telescope and setup in the front yard. My wife got "Turn Left at Orion" for me for Father's day so I thought I'd put that book through it's paces.
First, I took a look at M57 Ring Nebula since I can find that easily now between Sulafat and Sheliak in Lyra. Again, in my scope, I could make out that it was circular extremely faint cloud in the 6.4mm EP (159x) and could see that it was darker in the middle at the threshold of my averted vision. I think if I had a darker sight, clearer skies, or more aperature I would be able to see the ring properly.
I flipped open "Turn Left at Orion" and paged around the summer constillations and found M27 (Dumbbell Nebula). I had tried to find this nebula in the Fall of 2007 when it was in the West and wasn't able to find it. I believe "Turn Left at Orion" recommended starting at 12 gam Sge, the pointer star in Sagitta and going due North (I'm writing this report 2 days after the fact, and I do not have the book with me at present). I found this nebula easily. With the 26mm plossl (39x), it looked like a faint cloud. With averted vision, I thought I imagined the dumbbell shape associated with it. I was just very excited to finally have found this nebula.
According to "Turn Left" Brocchi's Cluster was North-West from the two tail feathers of Sagitta (5 alf Sge and 6 bet Sge). I centered the two tail stars in the scope (I cover about 1.3 deg. True FOV with the 26mm EP and these two stars fit together nicely in the field). I started moving North-West and I came across some bright stars, but I later realized the cluster is too large to be seen in 1.3 deg. FOV. I think I saw the "hook" in the "coathanger" but didn't see the "arms". I did not have binoculars with me to verify that this was what I saw.
I turned to Cygnus in "Turn Left at Orion" and NGC 6826 (the Blinking Planetary) looked interesting, so I found the "wing" stars of Cygnus (1 kap Cyg and 10 iot Cyg). Both these stars are magnitude 3.8 so I had no trouble seeing them. The third star in from the "wing tip" (13 tht Cyg) was a tough one to see being at magnitude 4.5 I could just barely see it through averted vision. I did manage to get the scope centered on 13 tht Cyg and here's where the diagrams in "Turn Left" really helped. As I moved east from 13 tht Cyg is a double star to hop to (16 Cyg and a companion) and NGC 6826 is in the same FOV just a bit further East. NGC 6826 indeed does look fuzzy through averted vision and looks like just a star through direct vision, but it is very small. Even under 159x (6.4mm plossl EP) it looks small - smaller than the Ring Nebula. I was very happy to have found it. I would love to see this planetary with bigger aperature and more magnification (and less light pollution).
Later, I re-visited Jupiter in the South-East. I could see 2 main cloud belts (just north and south of the equator). 3 moons formed a small triangle on the right, and one was far off to the left. I could not make out the Great Red Spot.
-StarNerd