Reader Forums
Astronomy forums are FREE. If you wish to participate you must LOGIN | REGISTER.

CCD imaging

Meade vs. Celestron
Last post 07-04-2005 04:27 PM by jgraham. 2 replies.
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
  • 07-04-2005 10:39 AM

    • agiaccio
    • Joined on 06-22-2005
    • Montreal (Canada)
    • Posts 26

    Meade vs. Celestron

    For taking pictures of planets and the moon through a Celestron NexStar 8 GPS XLT SCT, is there any differences between the Meade LPI and the Celestron NexImage?  Would one have any advantage over the other (hardware / software)?

     

  • 07-04-2005 12:55 PM In reply to

    Re: Meade vs. Celestron

    I have heard that the NexImage is better than the LPI, but both the lpi and the NexImage take fantastic pictures.
    Signature
    My AstroEquipment:
    WilliamOptics ZS80 II ED
    15x70's Skymasters
    Digital Rebel XT
    Clear Dark Skies to Everyone,
    Zach
  • 07-04-2005 04:27 PM In reply to

    • jgraham
    • Joined on 05-10-2005
    • Dayton, Ohio
    • Posts 157

    Re: Meade vs. Celestron

    I've used the LPI quite a bit, but I've never seen an NexImage, so bear that in mind.

    From what I've read the NexImage is very similar to the ToUcam webcam modified for use on a telescope; primarily removing the lens and adapting the case with a 1.25" barrel. Sooo, the NexImage is comparable to buying a ToUcam already modified and ready to use and it's operated in the same way; you capture videos of the Moon and planets using third-party software, strip out the best images from the image stream, stack and average those. I haven;t seen very many pictures taken with a NexImage, but I have seen many taken with the ToUcam and they're excellent so I'd assume you can do similar work with the NexImage.

    Now for the LPI. The LPI is similar in that it uses a small CMOS array (an array similar to a CCD but operates on a slightly different principal) and you connect it to your computer via a USB cable. There the similarity pretty much ends. The LPI is not a modified webcam but a webcam-like camera designed specifically for astrophotography and it comes with software specifically designed for that purpose. Instead of taking a video stream it takes individual pictures which are normally selcted, aligned, and stacked in real-time using the LPI software, though you can save the source images individually for processing with the image processing software that comes with the camera or other third-party software like Registax. Personally, I let the LPI software do the stacking and I just use Registax to apply some additional sharpening to the final image.

    From what I've seen both cameras are very capable of producing high quality images so you'd probably do well with either one. The LPI came out before the NexImage so I ended up with an LPI and I'm very happy with it. It's a turn-key system that I routinely use to take high resolution images of the Sun, Moon, and planets and I've also used it to image asteroids as faint as 12th magnitude.

    -John

    Signature
    Homebuilt telescopes from 4.25-16.5"
    LXD75 N6, SN6, DS-2130, EXT60
    Orion StarBlast
    Meade LPI, DSI, DSI Pro
    60mm Tasco Refractors
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2009 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems