<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Introducing NASA’s “lone gunmen”</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2008/07/16/introducing-nasa-s-lone-gunmen.aspx</link><description>NASA’s lone gunmen say they have designed a better, safer, cheaper version of the Ares I crew launcher (above), one of the cornerstones of the post-Shuttle space program. NASA Remember the “ lone gunmen ,” the trio of militantly nonconformist Uber-geeks</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: Introducing NASA’s “lone gunmen”</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2008/07/16/introducing-nasa-s-lone-gunmen.aspx#385094</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:02:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:385094</guid><dc:creator>marcof</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well.. of course there&amp;#39;s always two sides to every story, but from the articles I read, it really seems NASA is making the same mistake they did back when they scrapped the Saturn and went all-out for the Shuttle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i&amp;#39;ve read the presentations on the directlaunch website and they certainly look very plausible to me.. but I&amp;#39;m not a rocket scientist by profession.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It bothers me there&amp;#39;s a straight &amp;quot;no way&amp;quot; from NASA, without even really trying to look into it.. at least, that&amp;#39;s what the article implies..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=385094" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>