<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sorry, Mr. Bowie, there's still no life on Mars</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2008/01/30/sorry-mr-bowie-there-s-no-life-on-mars.aspx</link><description>In 1967, Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin captured the famous footage of what many cryptozooligists and kooks believe is Bigfoot. Perhaps sick of urban sprawl, the Patterson-Gimin Sasquatch relocated to the Red Planet. In a panoramic image captured by</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: Sorry, Mr. Bowie, there's still no life on Mars</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2008/01/30/sorry-mr-bowie-there-s-no-life-on-mars.aspx#368066</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:368066</guid><dc:creator>StarTalker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, wait a minute....it DOES look like an old woman! &amp;nbsp;;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...and the blue arrow above her is clearly a sign of intelligent life!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=368066" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Sorry, Mr. Bowie, there's still no life on Mars</title><link>http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2008/01/30/sorry-mr-bowie-there-s-no-life-on-mars.aspx#367600</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:54:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5cad643e-09e9-4c3f-b1be-205e244b4f67:367600</guid><dc:creator>vanneck</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Although the image in this article is a bit blurry, higher res images clearly show that the &amp;quot;hominid&amp;quot; is simply a shadow on the side of a rock, the rest of which blends in with the background. However, upon close inspection the outline of the rock can be clearly discerned. I&amp;#39;m just surprised at how many &amp;quot;kooks&amp;quot; refuse to see the obvious. This is no different from those &amp;quot;optical illusion&amp;quot; books where your turn the picture of the pretty girl upside down to get an old woman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=367600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>