Blog

Will we have another Galileo?

Posted 08-21-2009 by Bill Andrews
Galileo GalileiAn interesting story on Slate.com takes this, the 400th anniversary of Galileo Galilei’s first telescope, to wonder why we call him by his first name. After all, its subhead points out, “We don’t go around saying ‘Albert’ discovered relativity.” (Briefly, it’s “because that's how he referred to himself.”)

But reading it, I wondered if we’d ever have another Galileo. Or, for that matter, if we’d ever see another Albert (Einstein) or even another Stephen (Hawking). As science becomes increasingly devoted to group work, with whole labs and teams making discoveries instead of individuals, is it likely a single scientist will ever be responsible for as much as these luminaries were?

It’s a question I remember asking just over 10 years ago, to the then-director of the Buehler Planetarium in Davie, Florida, when I was just a wee high school volunteer. Well, actually, I asked her who the next Einstein or Hawking might be, and she said it seemed pretty unlikely we’d see anyone of their caliber willing to go it alone again. Over the years, I’ve come to agree that that’s how things seem to be going.

But can that really be true? No more super-famous, game-changing scientists? What about Neil deGrasse Tyson, the six-time guest on The Colbert Report? Or even Carl Sagan, arguably the most successful popularizer of science ever? Both are pretty super-famous dudes, and both legitimately advanced science and have made significant contributions to their fields.

Well, great as they are (and as much as I love them), their fame is more the result of their efforts to popularize science, and not so much the science itself. These guys, in addition to being scientists, are authors and public speakers, but Einstein pretty much just did physics and an occasional patent office clerkship. And sure, Galileo did more than just build his telescope and work out some physics, but it’s his science that makes him memorable.

So what do you think? Will no more groundbreaking work come from a single genius? Or will we see another of Einstein’s or Galileo’s ilk? If so, can you name any contemporary candidates?

Comments



To comment on the blog, you must be registered and logged into Astronomy.com. To register, click here.
  • mmfiore said:

    Yes, I believe we will see another Galileo or Einstein. Its just a matter of time. Perhaps he or she is out there right now.  

    There is a new theory that is challenging the current paradigm in physics which is Quantum Mechanics and String Theory. There is a new Theory of Everything breakthrough. It exposes the flaws in both Quantum Theory and String Theory. Please Help us set the physics community back on the right course and prove that Einstein was right! Visit our site The Theory of Super Relativity: http://www.superrelativity.org

    August 21, 2009 9:10 PM
  • vitozilla said:

    More and more, science projects rely on teams.  

    For one, the questions that arose from the answers people like Albert came up with are exceptionally complex.  Most individuals today still don't quite understand what Albert was talking about.

    But more so...money to fund such research.  You pretty much have to have a group to warrant funding.  Why would the NSF want to fund "that crazy guy" who has envisioned a whole new way to look at the world?

    I will always believe that the imagination and creativity of an individual will produce the next "aha" event.  It's just a matter of statistical probability...a matter of time.

    Who the next one is, it's hard to say...maybe Brian Greene?  The people mentioned have made significant contributions in their fields, but the popularization of science is probably their most significant.  They help create the sparks of imagination that will lead to the next great discoverer.

    August 23, 2009 1:46 PM
  • Bill Andrews said:

    Well, at least it's good to see the debate's alive!  I do agree that it seems like funding and complexity will force scientists to work together, but like you both say, who knows what the future will bring?  I'd be happy to see another Albert, or Galileo come along.  

    And that's an interesting point, vitozilla, perhaps popularizing science can count as a scientific achievement by itself too.  After all, for there to be a breakthrough in science does require there to be people interested in it.

    August 25, 2009 11:51 AM
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2009 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems