Blog

Moondust mirrors

Posted 06-06-2008 by Francis Reddy

Peter Chen displays his 12-inch “moondust mirror.”  AAS photo by Richard Dreiser © 2008 American Astronomical Society
Once upon a time, the buzzwords in telescope making were Teflon and Formica. In the future, though, they may be epoxy and lunar dust.

Peter Chen and his colleagues at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, presented a novel recipe for making telescope mirrors at the American Astronomical Society meeting in St. Louis June 4. For years, Chen has been exploring the use of composite materials in making lightweight, high-quality telescope mirrors with an eye to building big scopes on the Moon. 

The key to building massive structures of any kind on the Moon is to use as many local resources as possible — “in situ resource utilization,” in NASA-speak. So, Chen’s team combined simulated moondust with carbon nanotubes. The result was a strong, thermally stable material with the consistency of concrete. Chen notes this stuff could be used as the building blocks of a lunar base.

The team poured layers of epoxy over a disk of this lunar concrete and spun the unit until the liquid cured. “I just used a pottery wheel,” Chen says, smiling. The result was a 12-inch-wide mirror blank with a parabolic surface. When they coated the blank with a small amount of aluminum, the researchers had a telescope mirror.

For building a lunar scope the size of Hubble, Chen’s process requires transporting 132 pounds (60 kilograms) of epoxy, 13 pounds (6 kg) of carbon nanotubes, and less than 1/3 ounce (1 gram) of aluminum. The remaining raw material required — 1,300 pounds (600 kg) of moondust — is already at the construction site.

But Chen is thinking much bigger than a lunar Hubble. "We could make huge telescopes on the Moon relatively easily," he says. "Since most of the materials are already there in the form of dust, you don't have to bring very much stuff with you, and that saves a ton of money."

He envisions monolithic mirrors as large as 50m across. That would take about 4,000 pounds (1,800 kg) of epoxy and a pound (about half a kilogram) of aluminum. How much lunar dust? “I don’t even want to think about that,” Chen says, laughing.

He suggests that future telescope makers might select a promising patch of lunar real estate and use robots to remove the rocks. Then solar concentrators — built using the same moondust-mirror material — could fuse the dust. Next, add layers of epoxy to create a smooth surface, then figure it to a parabola using ion beams, a process that would take advantage of the environment’s high vacuum.

Astronomers say a 50m lunar scope would let them record spectra from extrasolar planets and detect gases like ozone and methane, indicative of life. Add one or two more such scopes, and they could work together to directly image alien worlds.

That’s not a bad rationale for revisiting the Moon.

Comments

  • markoller said:

    Why not think big?  There is already a telescope lens as big as the Sun.  It is the Sun.  The only problem is the Sun's focal length: at least 550 AU or 51 billion miles.    During the Orion project in the late fifties and early sixties, however, there were realistic plans to build an Empire State building sized space craft powered by 20 kiloton nuclear bombs.  It could have reached speeds of 6 million mph.  Of all the things humans are doing to ruin the environment, this would be the least significant.

    For this purpose, the Orion spacecraft would overkill, but we could propel an unmanned 'eyepiece' to sufficient speeds with low yield neutron bombs.   The yields would be lower still in a vacuum, and even the anti-nuclear hysterics should not object to small nuclear explosions in interplanetary space.    Of course they would object, never mind the Sun and cosmic rays.  If the late Robert Bussard's IEC boron fusion concept works as well as hoped, nuclear explosions will no longer be necessary.

    Has anyone considered using the Sun's gravitational lens to focus the highest energy cosmic rays from the center of the galaxy?  The Sun's core could also focus neutrinos at a much closer distance than 550 AU.

    July 2, 2008 11:55 AM
  • Francis Reddy said:

    Orion Project: The original concept requires 500 to 1,000 nuclear blasts per launch. We apparently define "significant" differently.

    The Sun as a gravitational lens: Von Eshleman at Stanford University wrote a nice paper about this in Science in 1979. His thinking seems to be that the solar corona would be pretty limiting to the focused radiation at all but the shortest wavelengths. A given probe could study only one strip of the sky per orbit, so you'd need many probes orbiting at 550 AU to cover a large swath of sky -- which would take a long time no matter how you slice it.

    If you're looking for planets, say, the better idea is to survey the sky for microlensing events caused by them. In fact, that's how some planets are being found.

    July 3, 2008 9:15 AM
  • markoller said:

    I was unable to read Von Eshleham's article, but "Multiwavelength focusing with the Sun as gravitational lens" states: "The perturbations by the solar corona plasma will significantly blur electromagnetic radiation for wavelengths longer than those of the IR domain. "  adsabs.harvard.edu/.../2005ExA....20..307K  That leaves the entire spectrum except radio waves.

    Has anyone considered using the Sun's core to concentrate gravity waves and neutrinos.  Both would travel straight through the Sun, and half of the Sun's mass is concentrated in one quarter of its diameter.  This kind of gravity lens is also two dimensional, not just a ring.

    July 5, 2008 1:58 AM

About Francis Reddy

Francis Reddy
  Francis Reddy is a senior editor with Astronomy magazine.
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2007 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems