Blog

You can fool some of the people all of the time ...

Posted 03-20-2008 by Jeremy McGovern

If there is a hoax involving anything in the sky, Astronomy staff members will receive questions about it. Do you remember the “Mars as big as the Full Moon” prank?

Lately, I’ve received a few inquiries asking if “moonvertising” is real. This comes from recent billboard and web advertising from the firm Goodby, Silverstein & Partners. This tongue-in-cheek campaign claims Latrobe Brewery Co. will use a ginormous laser to place the Rolling Rock Brewery logo on the next Full Moon.

Will you see the Rolling Rock logo during the next Full Moon? Only if you look at a bottle of the pale ale.

That better be one big laser and logo if the advertisers want naked eyes to see advertising on an object hundreds of thousands miles away. Something tells me that the military would accomplish this feat before a brewery. 

I think they picked the wrong phase. Wouldn’t you rather try this during the New Moon? Sunlight reflected by the Full Moon would wash out the logo.

I suppose when a company sells beverages that taste like something run through a boot, you have to rely on gimmicks rather than confident statements about products quality. Watch any brewery television ad if you want further evidence.

Ironically, this advertising device is about a product whose usage distorts your vision and makes you more stupid — 12 fluid ounces at a time. You’re more likely to see two Moons rather than a logo on the Full Moon if you drink enough Rolling Rock.

Despite the erroneous advertising, I’m glad most reader e-mails I received were negative. People want the Moon to remain pristine. I wish most folks were this angry about light pollution.
 

Comments

  • Antitax said:

    The Moon is a big rock. Displaying something on the Moon would offend no more than displaying it on any other rock. Laser light is not filth. Our satellite will remain pristine if we shine light on it. We are already doing it inadvertedly every time a manmade photon reaches it. Natural radiation from everywhere in space strikes the Moon continuously. How much would a laser worsen that? What some people like or dislike is about personal taste; what is permitted or forbidden is about universal principles. Is it a crime or not? Does it violate someone's rights if we advertise on the Moon? No. It might displease some but that does not decide what to permit or ban. Only violating a person's rights is forbidden. Advertising on the Moon, if possible, would cause injustice to no one. It would be temporary and fun to watch through our scopes and binoculars, no matter if you enjoy the advertised product or not. When in doubt, leave people free. Ban as rarely as possible. Banning innocent actions is humanity' s greatest sin. Making the Moon a little less romantic for a while is not one. And no, I don't work for an ad company.

    March 22, 2008 12:21 PM
  • Jeremy McGovern said:

    My point was more so not to worry about this occurring rather than one human rights or aesthetics.

    However, I would say the Moon is much more than a big rock. Its presence has influenced our planet, such as the planting cycles and the astrology of the ancients to the tides.

    Taste and a complete lack of aesthetics is one view, but the Moon transcends property or business rights. The Moon cannot be owned by a nation or a single person - certainly not enough of it  to create a canvas of the Moon for the above scenario. Earthly property can, hence billboards from Route 66 to Times Square.

    But I suppose we might as well argue about how many angels can dance on on the point of a needle.

    March 24, 2008 9:08 PM
  • Antitax said:

    True, arguing about this is not top priority; it's not very worrysome to advertise on the Moon or not. My point was to avoid overregulating. Many people rush to ban what they dislike, even if it's not an injustice. I expect some would force people not to advertise (or do any work) on the Moon. I'd rather protect my species' freedom than Nature's looks. The bad habit of prohibiting too much could slow space exploitation. That would stifle reaping 99.9999999% of future resources.

    Some protest sending small nuclear reactors aboard probes. Some ignorant judges allow frivolous lawsuits against putting observatories on mountaintops. Observatories are some of the cleanest and quietest buildings; they occupy an infinitesimal share of land. It's a no-brainer to see how little disturbance they cause. Yet they are successfully accused of disfiguring nature. Fear of these thoughtless attacks on science and business made me write my first comment.

    March 25, 2008 6:44 AM

About Jeremy McGovern

Jeremy McGovern
  Jeremy McGovern is an assistant editor with Astronomy magazine.
E-mail Address: Password:
Remember me?

Forgot your password » | Login help »

Not a member? Register » | Why join? »

My Profile

Copyright © 2007 Astronomy.com
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems