Primordial, as far as I know, no one has directly stated that there has been in consideration that there exists more than one type of inertia which is attributed to mass. I am stating, correctly I know, that there are two other types of inertia directly related to charge and spin at the unit level. When one considers these two other types of inertia in play, the whole schism between the quantum world and the macro world is diminished. As I said before, I approached this in what is termed as a semi-classical viewpoint. I am surprised that others have missed this....it all becomes so clear. Now, to other statements:
In dynamic systems to where an Absolute Equilibrium (which from our viewpoint may never occur, but perhaps...) the direct contribution in maintaining our 3d conformity or stability will be such that either thermal connectivity will contribute exactly 2/3 and the potential connectivity contribution will be exactlly 1/3; or the thermal connectivity will contribute exactly 1/3 and the potential connectivity will contribute 2/3 exactly. The time connectivity will either be exactly 1 or 0. On the unit scale (quantum) we see this as charge, mass, and spin.
In a dynamic system to where equilibrium does not exist, at least at the unit level or the quantum level, the spin quantity must exactly equal 1/2. Spin on the large scale is the time "mediator". As I stated before, on the large scale this spin quality is seen as time connectivity. In condtions of absolute equilibrium we may see time connectivity values of 0 and/or 1. However, the three inertial state of time as seen from the stable 3d matrix appears continuous in the range 0 < t < 1. Probability. There is more on this.
These inertial states act in tandem however thermal connectivity and potential connectivity act directly converse to each other, that is when there is a self-contained system where they both occur. In a system where one or the other is absent, time connectivity can "fill in" for one or the other. 3d dimensional conformity is such that charge can determine 1 dimension and mass must determine 2; or charge can determine 2 dimensions and mass must determine 1 dimension. The spin is the mediator and its action can establish a complex 4d system which at the large scale we see as time. This 4d complex gives the Appearance of time as a dimension. The actual energy total cost, contrary to what I posted before is E = mc(c+1), or mc^2 + mc to wit one or the other stays Apparent (this may be hard to determine, or it may be easy to determine...lol).