Bullfox : EXACTLY, as each object has its on entropy history or energy state history and all are related objects contained within the same universe, these objects must have dimensional assignments for their relative histories along some dimensional axis (?), we as human refer to it as a miss conception of time, something similar to age which I think is also an aspect of matter and space-time, for with out this attribute their would not be an event in the essence of a singularity of an event nor a continuation of events. Just think about it.
Consider this, it appears to me entropy makes its entry ( which to our understanding is our time history of energy distribution. ) at the quantum fluctuation level. With this idea in mind, this would place entropy's interaction with the universe must be at the interface of the three spatial dimensions and the time dimension of the universe. Just think about it.
Consider this, the volume of a black hole occupies space-time of our universe, but yet the space-time at the event horizon, relative to an observer approaches zero and the black hole could be considered as an object represented as a function of entropy(?). just think about it.
Consider this, we view mass as occupying space-time, yet mass and space-time are very much related in their interaction, should space-time also have a history(?). Perhaps space-time occupies mass (?). Perhaps they are the same thing but observed from a particular reference, after all isn't that the purpose of dimensions (?). Just think about it.
Consider this, it appears to me, mass establishes an observational reference of space-time, but not the existence of space-time, however if you take away the reference of observation ( mass ) time looses history( its entropy ) a suspect of dimensionality (?). Just think about it.