Vortexes, Black Holes, Universe expansion, Dark enery - what's in common?

1911 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March, 2012
Vortexes, Black Holes, Universe expansion, Dark enery - what's in common?
Posted by Yehiel on Monday, March 05, 2012 10:54 AM

Dear everybody,

I was studying a  liquid vortex and have observed some of its intriguing features, which, if considered to be intrinsic for any kind of vortexes including Black Holes, could provide a hint on the origin of Universe accelerating expansion and on the source and the nature of the Dark Energy.

I am running a discussion on these matters at

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=42033.0;viewresults

and also have posted the related video clips of the liquid vortex developments at

http://www.youtube.com/user/YehielGotkis?feature=mhee

It would be great if you will send me your considerations or feedback in any acceptable form. I will accept even a stupidity sticker, because, as the great Albert Einstein once said :

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.”

Thanks,

  • Member since
    March, 2012
Posted by Yehiel on Monday, March 05, 2012 12:35 PM

My potential viewers/discussion participants! I was/am discussing there vortex appearances which have attracted my personal attention. I have plenty of vortex developments video records and images in my database. I am sure there is more about the vortex details there, which I've missed to pay attention and discuss them, so, if you would like me to search videos and images for some particular details, or features, you consider to be important for you, just let me know and I will do it .

Best,

    Yehiel

P.S. Here is a couple of the vortex pictures  demonstrating:

a) vortex generated surface waves clearly demonstrating it is a  DOUBLE SPIRAL WAVE, b) samples of the lower below the "event horizon" double spiral

  • Member since
    May, 2009
Posted by TAET on Monday, March 05, 2012 8:00 PM

Gooday' Yehiel,

I'm not sure if you've read the 'Unified Field Theory' below, linking all these factors, and whether or not, it has any relevance, or similarities to what you may be thinking of.

In any case, the link is http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unified-Vorticii-Theory-UVT-by-Anton-Kole/102745859787252 , and it explains in simple, and short terms, a 'Unified Field Theory' which incorporates all the above features, including gravity, and dark matter. See the 'Info' section on the site.

Vorticies are one of the key elements in the theory.

Also a discussion at http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/t/40219.aspx has been going on for a while now, which eventually lead to the 'Unified Field Theory' above. Feel free to join in.

Cheers,

Anton Kole

  • Member since
    March, 2012
Posted by Yehiel on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:22 AM

Dear Anton,

I've started reading the presentation on your New Theory and Model of Dark Energy and here are my inputs inserted into your text below:

"I am an amateur scientist (YG - there are scientists and there are not-scientists, so you have to chose between the two options 1-amateur and 2-scientist. The two do not work together), and believe I do not yet possess the experience and qualifications (YG- with this I completely agree) to be comfortable in preparing a formal paper ...

I have recently developed a Theory ... my Theory is both original (YG- there is normally one right theory,  the rests are wrong, although each of them could be original indeed) and, above all (YG- above what all?), the correct solution (YG- How do you know, it is correct?) to the Dark Energy enigma.

...........................

Briefly, Dark Energy (DE) are the emissions produced as a waste product, from all atoms (YG- Well, it contradicts all the known postulates of modern science, so if you are right, then the rest of the scientific community is wrong, and the whole current scientific structure has to be dismantled immediately as being  completely wrong and not representative. I strongly believe that the currently widely accepted scientific fundamentals are correct, so, thereby, I cannot accept your original scientific fundamentals and would prefer not to continue with the analysis of your Theory. Respectfully, Yehiel) ."

  • Member since
    May, 2009
Posted by TAET on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:41 AM

Not a prob Yehiel.

Welcome to the Forum :)

  • Member since
    March, 2012
Posted by Yehiel on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:58 PM

I just wanted to let you know that if you are interested in scientists to learn, understand and communicate with you about your ideas, you have to be within the same frame of fundamentals  the wider scientific community is dealing with.

You, certainly, can  build your own, completely different and original  space of assumptions and postulates, it is up to you. However you will not find anybody from outside of this your personal intellectual space to discuss and communicate with you about your ideas. Simply, because there will not be any common communication points between your Universe and the outside scientific Universe.

Best,

    Yehiel

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

ADVERTISEMENT

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly email newsletter.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Find us on Facebook

Loading...