I've started reading the presentation on your New Theory and Model of Dark Energy and here are my inputs inserted into your text below:
"I am an amateur scientist (YG - there are scientists and there are not-scientists, so you have to chose between the two options 1-amateur and 2-scientist. The two do not work together),
and believe I do not yet possess the experience and qualifications (YG- with this I completely agree) to be
comfortable in preparing a formal paper ...
I have recently developed a
Theory ... my Theory is both original (YG- there is normally one right theory, the rests are wrong, although each of them could be original indeed) and, above
all (YG- above what all?), the correct solution (YG- How do you know, it is correct?) to the Dark Energy enigma.
Briefly, Dark Energy (DE) are
the emissions produced as a waste product, from all atoms (YG- Well, it contradicts all the known postulates of modern science, so if you are right, then the rest of the scientific community is wrong, and the whole current scientific structure has to be dismantled immediately as being completely wrong and not representative. I strongly believe that the currently widely accepted scientific fundamentals are correct, so, thereby, I cannot accept your original scientific fundamentals and would prefer not to continue with the analysis of your Theory. Respectfully, Yehiel) ."